geofs.com
Category: Gaming
Description of geofs.com
geofs.com appears to be the domain for GeoFS, a long-established web-based flight simulation service. Based on the domain name and its long registration history, the site likely provides browser-accessible aviation simulation content, potentially aimed at hobbyists, students, and users interested in casual or lightweight flight simulation without requiring large software downloads.
The domain has been registered for many years and does not appear to be a temporary or newly created web property. While the provided scan data does not include page content or operator details, the name strongly suggests a geography- or geospatial-themed flight simulator brand, and the domain appears to function as a standalone service rather than a parked or resale page.
Safety Assessment for geofs.com
The available scan results are broadly reassuring. At the time of this scan, the domain was flagged by 0 out of 91 security engines, and the malware scan did not report any flagged files, suspicious external links, or iframe-related concerns. In addition, the domain was not listed by the checked content-malice and phishing-oriented blacklist databases.
The domain's age is also a positive contextual signal: it has been registered for roughly 24 years, which generally lowers the likelihood of opportunistic abuse compared with very new domains. No mail-reputation blocklist issues were reported in the DNSBL checks. One technical caution is that the scan indicates invalid or missing SSL/TLS, which may affect connection security or reflect a scan limitation depending on how the site was reached.
Based on available data, no threats were detected at the time of this scan.
Technical Description
The domain is registered through Network Solutions and uses WorldNIC nameservers. DNSSEC appears to be unsigned, which means DNS responses may not benefit from DNSSEC-based authenticity validation. The server IP resolves to 174.77.82.187 and the hosting network appears to be Cox Communications in the United States.
A notable technical issue in the scan is that SSL/TLS was reported as invalid or missing, with protocol details unavailable. That may indicate the site does not properly present HTTPS, that HTTPS is misconfigured, or that the scanner could not complete a valid TLS handshake at the time of testing. Aside from that, the scan data did not identify malware-related technical indicators.
Share your experience with this website. Was it safe? Did you encounter any issues?