kgslb.com
Category: Web Infrastructure
Description of kgslb.com
kgslb.com appears to be a web infrastructure domain rather than a consumer-facing website. The available classification data labels it as web infrastructure, and the hostname pattern and nameservers suggest it may be used for load balancing, traffic distribution, or backend network services associated with a larger online platform.
Based on the hosting information, the domain appears to be connected to infrastructure in South Korea and hosted with Daumkakao. Its long registration history and high traffic ranking indicate it is likely part of an established online service ecosystem rather than a newly created standalone site aimed at general browsing or retail activity.
Safety Assessment for kgslb.com
The scan results for kgslb.com were broadly clean at the time of this scan. No detections were reported by 0 out of 91 security engines, malware scanning did not identify flagged files or suspicious external resources, and the domain was not listed by the checked blacklist databases. The domain age of about seven years and its strong traffic ranking also reduce the likelihood that this is a throwaway or newly created abusive domain.
One technical limitation is that the site did not present a valid or detectable SSL/TLS configuration during the scan, which may affect direct browser access or indicate that the domain is intended for backend infrastructure rather than public web use. That issue alone does not necessarily indicate malicious activity, especially for infrastructure-oriented hosts. Based on available scan data, no significant threats were detected at the time of this scan.
Technical Description
The domain is approximately seven years old, registered through Megazone Corp., dba HOSTING.KR, and uses custom nameservers at gslb1.kgslb.com and gslb2.kgslb.com. DNSSEC appears to be unsigned. The resolved IP address was 103.27.151.10, geolocated to Jeju-si, South Korea, with hosting attributed to Daumkakao.
The scan did not identify a valid SSL/TLS certificate or confirm supported protocol details, and the web server software was not disclosed. In context, that may simply reflect a non-public infrastructure endpoint or a host that is not intended to serve standard HTTPS content directly, rather than a security incident by itself.
Share your experience with this website. Was it safe? Did you encounter any issues?