pstatic.net
Category: Content Delivery
Description of pstatic.net
pstatic.net appears to be a long-established infrastructure domain used for static content delivery. Based on its name, category labels, and technical context, it likely serves assets such as images, scripts, stylesheets, or other web resources that support larger online services rather than functioning as a standalone consumer-facing website.
The domain has been registered since 2011 and uses nameservers associated with Naver, suggesting it may be operated as part of that broader web ecosystem or by an affiliated technology organization. Its classification as content delivery and information technology is consistent with a backend or support role in web infrastructure.
Safety Assessment for pstatic.net
The available scan results are broadly reassuring. At the time of this scan, the domain was flagged by 0 out of 91 security engines, the malware scan reported no detected threats, and the checked blacklist and threat-database sources did not indicate known phishing or malware activity. The domain is also relatively mature, which generally reduces the likelihood of opportunistic abuse compared with newly registered domains.
One technical caution is that the scan reports invalid or missing SSL/TLS on the tested endpoint. That does not by itself indicate malicious activity, especially for a static asset or infrastructure domain that may be accessed in specific ways, but it can affect transport security or reflect a non-browser-facing configuration. No mail-reputation blocklist issues were reported. Based on available scan data, no significant threats were detected at the time of this scan.
Technical Description
The domain is hosted on an IP address in Seongnam-si, South Korea, with hosting attributed to NBP, and it uses nameservers under naver.com. DNSSEC is reported as unsigned, which means DNS responses may not benefit from DNSSEC validation protections. This is common on many domains, though signed DNS would provide an additional integrity layer.
The main technical concern in this scan is the reported invalid or missing SSL/TLS configuration, with protocol and certificate expiry unavailable. For an infrastructure domain, this may reflect how the endpoint was queried rather than a definitive service issue, but it is still a point worth noting from a security-hardening perspective.
Share your experience with this website. Was it safe? Did you encounter any issues?